MURDERS IN SINGAPORE
Recently in the news, we would have taken notice of the 69-Year-Old Boon Tat Street Murder or even the murder at Yishun Ring Road. With news headlines these days, you may have come across the term ‘manslaughter’ which is often used by the media to refer to acts of killing that do not qualify as murder. In case you were wondering what this term means, we have prepared a helpful guide to the difference between manslaughter and murder in Singapore law.
What is manslaughter?
Manslaughter is a legal term used in some common law countries (those whose legal systems originate in English law) to refer to a homicide that is considered less blameworthy than murder.
In these jurisdictions, manslaughter is often divided into voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. Voluntary manslaughter refers to situations where the offender intended to kill but the crime was not considered murder due to a partial defence. On the other hand, involuntary manslaughter refers to situations where the offender did not intend to kill but instead caused death by recklessness or negligence.
How does Singapore law deal with manslaughter?
Lawyers will tell you that Singapore does not have an offence of manslaughter. However, Singapore law does deal with crimes of homicide in a similar way.
In particular, not all acts of killing are automatically considered murder. Instead, when a person is killed in Singapore, the person responsible for causing the death may be charged with one of a number of offences:
- Murder (s 300 of the Penal Code);
- Culpable homicide not amounting to murder (s 299 of the Penal Code);
- Causing death by a rash or negligent act (s 304A of the Penal Code).
The distinction between these offences is very important when it comes to sentencing. This is because, on one extreme, the maximum penalty for murder is death (a mandatory sentence if the killing was caused with the intention of causing death), while on the other extreme, the maximum penalty for causing death by a negligent act is imprisonment for two years.
Murder in Singapore
Murder is a very serious crime which attracts severe punishments. Section 300 of the Penal Code states that a person commits murder if he or she causes the death of another person while possessing any of the following states of mind:
- the intention of causing death;
- the intention of causing bodily injury and knowledge that the injury is likely to kill the person;
- the intention of causing a bodily injury which is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death (usually determined based on objective medical evidence);
- the knowledge that what you are doing is so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death.
Additionally, under Singapore law, it is still murder in Singapore even if the offender did not intend to kill the actual victim but instead intended to kill someone else. This covers situations in which a bystander, rather than the intended victim, is killed by mistake. In such situations, the offender would still be charged with murder.
The maximum sentence for murder is the death penalty, which is mandatory for murder under the first limb of section 300 – in other words if a person caused the death of another person with the intention of causing death.
If a person committed murder under any of the remaining three limbs of section 300 – that is, causing death of another person without the specific intention of causing death – then the death penalty is optional and the Court may instead choose to impose a sentence of imprisonment for the rest of the person’s natural life, with caning.
It is important to note that the death penalty is not imposed on persons under the age of 18 or on pregnant women. In these cases, life imprisonment is imposed instead.
Special exceptions to murder in Singapore
A charge of murder can be reduced to one of culpable homicide not amounting to murder if one or more of the special exceptions to murder, found in section 300 of the Penal Code, can be successfully proved.
These exceptions include:
- Provocation – when the offender was deprived of self-control by grave and sudden provocation;
- Exceeding private defence – when the offender had the right of private defence but exceeded it by killing the other person;
- Exceeding power of a public servant – when the offender was exceeding the power of a public servant in good faith;
- Sudden fight – when the murder was committed as a result of a sudden fight and the offender did not take advantage or behave cruelly;
- Consent – when the victim is above 18 and had consented to the risk of being killed;
- Infanticide – when a mother kills her child, and the child’s age is less than 12 months old
- Diminished Responsibility – when the offender was suffering from an abnormality of mind, meaning that his or her mental faculties were substantially impaired.
Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Singapore
If the offender is not found guilty of murder, he or she may be found guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. This is a less serious charge than murder. Although it is not punishable by the death penalty, this offence still attracts severe punishments.
The provisions for culpable homicide, found in section 299 of the Penal Code, are worded very similarly to those for murder because murder is considered a subset of culpable homicide.
Specifically, culpable homicide not amounting to murder arises when the offender caused the death of another person and had either the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death or the knowledge that his or her act was likely to cause death.
In other words, the offence addresses situations in which the offender’s level of blameworthiness was lower because the offender’s knowledge of the probability that his or her action would lead to death was also lower.
Alternatively, the offender may be charged with this offence rather than murder if the prosecution cannot prove that the offender had the mental state required for a charge of murder.
If you are found Guilty of Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder in Singapore
If an offender is found guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, the punishment depends on his or her mental state at the time of the killing. If death was caused with the intention of causing death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, the offender would be punished with either imprisonment for life with caning or up to 20 years’ imprisonment with fine or caning.
On the other hand, if death was caused with the knowledge that the act was likely to cause death or but without any intention to cause either death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, the offender will be punished with either up to 10 years’ imprisonment, fine, or caning, or with any combination of these punishments.
Causing death by a rash or negligent act
Causing death by a rash or negligent act is a less serious charge than murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder. It receives a comparatively much lower sentence because the degree of blameworthiness on the part of the offender is lower.
This is because the offender’s awareness that his or her actions would cause someone to die is much lower than for murder, where death is either intended or known to be a highly likely result, or culpable homicide not amounting to murder, where death is known to be a likely result.
What about Death caused by Rash or Negligence in Singapore
In Singapore’s penal code there are two limbs to section 304A – one for rashness and another for negligence.
Death Caused by Rash acts
Rashness refers to the offender’s awareness of the risk that death or injury could result, combined with the disregard for this risk. To determine whether the offender’s act was rash, the Court uses a subjective test. This means that the Court will try to imagine what was going through the offender’s mind when he or she was committing the act which caused death. If the offender is found guilty of causing death by a rash act, the punishment is up to 5 years’ imprisonment, fine, or both.
Death Caused by Negligence
On the other hand, negligence refers acts which fall below the standards expected of ordinary people. This is determined based on an objective test. This means that the Court will compare the offender’s actions to what an imagined ‘reasonable person’ in the same situation as the offender would do. If the offender is found guilty of causing death by a negligent act, the punishment is up to 2 years’ imprisonment, fine, or both.
How we can help you
If you find yourself in such a situation, our team of experienced Criminal Litigation Lawyers will be able to advise you on your matter. Such matters are filled with details and issues that require someone with a special set of skills to review and to advise you on the matter.
At I.R.B. Law LLP our Singaporean Lawyers will be able to guide you and explain to you each and every stage of the proceedings and guide you patiently through the process. So do not hesitate and contact us at +65 6589 8913 or send us an email at [email protected].