Introduction
When it comes to adoption in Singapore, IRB Law is a trusted and reputable law firm that aids individuals in the adoption process. With a team of experienced adoption lawyers, we provide expert guidance, support, and advice. Our firm is recognized for its professionalism and commitment to client satisfaction. We offer fixed and transparent fees, and provide an initial consultation to ensure clarity— even at initial stages.
Understanding Adoption
Overall, adoption involves the legal transfer of parental rights and responsibilities from biological parents to adoptive parents. According to the Adoption of Children Act (ACA), when a court passes an adoption order, the child’s legal ties with the biological parents are severed, transferring all rights, duties, obligations, and liabilities the adoptive parents.
Eligibility Requirements:
To initiate the adoption process, individuals involved must meet certain eligibility criteria, including:
The child must be below 21 years old and single.
The applicant must be at least 25 years old.
The applicant must be at least 21 years, but not more than 50 years older than the child.
Exceptions can be made if the child and applicant are blood relatives or if married parties are at least 25 years old and seeking to jointly adopt a child who is less than 21 years younger than them.
Consent from Relevant Parties
Obtaining consent from relevant parties is crucial in the adoption process. These parties may include the child’s parents, grandparents, guardian, custodian, the party responsible for the child’s financial support, and the applicant’s spouse (if applicable). Specific details about consent from the aforementioned parties are provided below:
According to the ACA, consent from the child’s biological parents is of utmost importance, generally serving as the primary requirement for adoption. It is essential to obtain their consent unless their parental rights have been terminated by a court order or other legal means.
In situations where the child’s parents are below 21 years old, the consent of the child’s grandparents may also be required. This provision ensures that the child’s extended family is involved in the decision-making process and promotes a comprehensive assessment of the child’s welfare.
Additionally, if custody has been granted to a non-parent, such as a guardian or custodian, their consent is necessary to proceed with the adoption. This requirement acknowledges the custodian’s role in the child’s upbringing and ensures their participation in the adoption process.
Moreover, the consent of the party responsible for the child’s financial support is vital. This party may include the child’s biological parents, a legal guardian, or an individual who has been providing financial assistance to the child. Their consent ensures that the child’s financial needs and welfare are adequately considered during the adoption proceedings.
Furthermore, if the applicant is married, the consent of their spouse is generally required. This requirement aims to involve both spouses in the adoption decision, acknowledging the shared responsibility and commitment to raising the child within a stable family environment.
It is crucial to note that the requirements in each adoption vary depending on circumstances of the case. The ACA provides guidelines on the consent process, which is carefully evaluated by the relevant authorities, such as the Family Court or the Adoption Board, to ensure that the interests of the child are prioritized and protected.
Types of Adoption Orders
There are three types of adoption orders; Adoption orders can be unconditional, conditional, or interim.
Unconditional adoption orders are the most common type granted by the court. The order effectively terminates the parental rights of the child’s biological parents and establishes a new parent-child relationship between the adoptive parents and the child. An unconditional order grants the adoptive parents full legal authority and responsibility for the child’s upbringing, welfare, and decision-making.
Conditional adoption orders may be issued with specific conditions set by the court. These conditions are imposed when the court deems it necessary to address unique circumstances or concerns surrounding the adoption. The court may attach conditions related to the child’s upbringing, education, religion, or any other relevant factors. Compliance with these conditions is essential to ensure the ongoing validity of the adoption order.
In certain cases, the Family Court may grant an interim adoption, which places the applicant on probation, providing specific directions regarding the child’s upbringing during the probationary period. This type of order is typically issued when the court requires more time to gather information, assess the suitability of the adoption arrangement, or evaluate the progress of the adoption process. During the interim period, the court may direct the applicant to undergo evaluations, assessments, or fulfill certain requirements outlined by the court to determine their suitability as adoptive parents. The court may also provide instructions regarding the child’s care, welfare, or any other relevant matters. After the interim period, the court reviews the situation and decides whether to issue a final unconditional or conditional adoption order.
Adoption of Stepchildren
Singapore also provides guidelines for adoption of a stepchild. Singapore citizens seeking to do so can apply to waive the Home Study Report (HSR). However, this does not apply to foreigners adopting stepchildren. Furthermore, if the stepchild is not a Singapore citizen, the adoption process follows that of adopting a foreign child.
Residency Requirements:
To be considered for adoption under the Singapore law, the child being adopted must be a resident of Singapore. This includes Singapore citizens, Singapore permanent residents, or Dependant’s Pass holders. A child residing in Singapore on a visit pass, student’s pass, or special pass is not considered a resident.
The Adoption Process
The adoption process begins with attending a compulsory Pre-Adoption Briefing (PAB) to learn about adoption procedures and parenting responsibilities. After identifying the child for adoption and obtaining consent from necessary parties, the applicant must gather official documentation and prepare an itemized list of adoption-related expenses.
Submitting an adoption application to the Family Court, either in-person or through a lawyer, leads to further steps, such as filing a request at the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) with specific documents. If the application is successful, a Guardian-In-Adoption (GIA) is appointed to safeguard the child’s interests, and an investigation by the MSF follows. A hearing at the Family Court determines if the adoption order is granted.
Case Analysis: A Deep Delve into WKT v WKV [2023] SGFC 6
Summary of the case:
The case of WKT and another v WKV [2023] SGFC 6, heard in the Family Court, Singapore, involved a dispute over the adoption of a child by foster parents, with the biological father contesting the proceedings. The court had to consider the paramount welfare of the child versus the biological father’s desire for potential reunification with his daughter, with whom he previously had limited contact. The Director-General of Social Welfare was appointed as the Guardian in Adoption (GIA) to conduct investigations, which concluded that the adoption would be in the child’s best interest. The court, after hearing arguments from both parties, allowed the adoption. Discontent with the decision, the natural father appealed.
The Applicants in this case were a married Singaporean couple, who had been foster parents to the child since her birth. The child’s natural parents, who were incarcerated, had consented to the child being placed in foster care. The natural mother later consented to the adoption, but the natural father, who had limited contact with the child, objected. The court proceedings involved several hearings and adjournments as the natural father sought legal aid and new legal representation.
After considering the evidence, written submissions, and oral arguments, the court dispensed with the natural father’s consent and granted the adoption to the foster parents. The court’s decision was based on the welfare of the child, considering the child’s bond with the foster parents and the limited contact with the natural father. The natural father, dissatisfied with the decision, filed an appeal. The court outlined the grounds for its decision and reiterated the importance of considering the welfare of the child as the paramount factor in adoption cases.
Please note that this summary provides an overview of the case and should not be considered legal advice. For a complete understanding of the case and its implications, refer to the full judgment and consult with legal professionals.
Issues considered in this case:
Issue 1: The Law regarding whether the Court should dispense with the Natural Father’s Consent
The court analysed the requirements under section 4(4) of the Adoption of Children Act 1939 to determine whether the natural father’s consent should be dispensed with. Section 4(4)(a) relates to abandonment, neglect, or persistent ill-treatment, which did not apply in this case as there were no allegations of such conduct. Section 4(4)(b) refers to physical or mental incapacity, which also did not apply as the natural father’s incarceration did not constitute incapacity. Therefore, the court focused on section 4(4)(c), which allows the court to dispense with consent based on the circumstances of the case. The court referred to previous cases, such as Re BJU and Re B, which provided guidance on when consent can be dispensed with. These cases considered factors such as the child’s well-being, attachment to the foster parents, and the natural parent’s ability to provide care and stability.
Issue 2: Whether granting or dismissing the Adoption would be in the best welfare of the Child
In this case, the court considered the child’s well-being and relationship with the foster parents. The child, who was 8 years old at the time of the hearing, was described as shy but well-adjusted. She had a close and loving relationship with the foster parents and expressed a desire to stay with them permanently. The child had also formed strong bonds with her younger foster siblings. The court noted that the child had special needs, showing improvement under the care, support, and treatment provided the foster parents. The court evaluated the background of the natural parents, who had a history of drug addiction and incarceration. Furthermore, though there were no allegations of persistent ill-treatment or neglect, the natural father had limited contact with the child.
Based on these considerations, the court found that granting the adoption would best protect the child’s welfare. The child had formed strong bonds with the foster parents, who provided a stable and loving environment. Reunification with the natural father would disrupt the child’s sense of security and potentially expose her to instability and risk. The court emphasized the importance of prioritizing the child’s best interest in adoption proceedings.
Please note that this summary provides an overview of the court’s analysis of the issues and should not be considered legal advice. For a comprehensive understanding, it is advisable to consult the full judgment and seek professional legal assistance.
Conclusion:
The child’s biological mother had a history of substance dependence and mental health issues, including diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. Since 2015, she had been in and out of prison, opting not to initiate any contact with the child after her release. As previously mentioned, the biological also had a history of incarceration for drug-related offenses and had limited contact with the child through supervised visitation. He expressed his concerns about the adoption but acknowledged that the applicants had provided good care for the child. The court considered the suitability of the applicants for long-term care and found that they had been providing stable and loving care. The court also assessed the Natural Father’s ability to care for the child and found that his history of drug addiction and relapse, as well as his limited contact and commitment to access sessions, raised concerns about his ability to provide a stable environment for the child. The court determined that the child’s welfare was of paramount importance and that granting the adoption would provide stability and predictability for the child’s future. On these grounds, the court dispensed with the Natural Father’s consent and granted the adoption.
Glossary of Terms in Adoption in Singapore:
- Adoption Suitability Assessment (ASA): A comprehensive assessment conducted by authorized adoption agencies to evaluate the suitability and readiness of prospective adoptive parents to adopt a child.
- Authorised Adoption Agencies (AAA): Organizations recognized and authorized by the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) to facilitate and oversee adoption processes in Singapore.
- Birth/Natural Parents: The biological parents of the child who is being considered for adoption.
- Disclosure Briefing: A mandatory briefing attended by prospective adoptive parents that provides guidance on issues related to disclosing a child’s adoption status and discussing their birth circumstances.
- Guardian-In-Adoption (GIA): A public officer appointed by the Minister for Social and Family Development to safeguard the interests of the child during the adoption process.
- Joint Adoption: Adoption carried out by a married couple together, where both spouses participate as joint applicants.
- Pre-Adoption Briefing (PAB): A compulsory briefing session attended by prospective adoptive parents to provide information and guidance on the adoption process and the responsibilities of adoptive parents.
- Prospective Adoptive Parents: Individuals or couples who are considering adopting a child and have initiated the adoption process.
- Relevant Person: Refers to someone who is a parent, guardian, custodian, or financially responsible for the child.
- State’s Care: Refers to children who are under the care and custody of the state, usually in a children’s home or with foster parents.
- Surrogacy: The arrangement in which a woman carries a pregnancy and gives birth to a child on behalf of another individual or couple, who become the intended parents of the child.
- Unconditional Adoption Order: An adoption order granted by the court without any additional conditions or requirements.
- Interim Adoption Order: An adoption order issued by the court on a provisional basis, typically subject to certain conditions or further assessments.
- Placement: The act of placing a child with prospective adoptive parents for the purpose of adoption.
- Consent: The agreement or permission given by relevant persons, such as birth parents or guardians, for the adoption of a child.
- Birth Certificate: A legal document that records the birth of a child and includes important information such as the child’s name, date of birth, and parentage.
- Adoption Order: A court order that legally establishes the adoptive parents as the child’s legal parents and severs the child’s legal ties with the biological parents.
- Adoption-related Service: Services provided in tandem with the adoption process, including counselling, assessments, and support services for adoptive parents and birth parents.
- Adoption Agency: An organization or entity involved in facilitating adoptions, providing services such as matching adoptive parents with children, conducting assessments, and facilitating the legal process.
- Child Trafficking: The illegal act of recruiting, transporting, transferring, harbouring, or receiving a child for the purpose of exploitation, including adoption-related activities that involve the illegal movement or sale of children.
Please note that this glossary provides general definitions of terms related to adoption in Singapore. It is important to refer to the specific provisions of the Adoption of Children Act and consult with legal professionals or authorized adoption agencies for accurate and detailed information related to adoption in Singapore.
Details of the ACA and Relevant Legislation:
In Singapore, the Adoption of Children Act 2022 (ACA 2022), which will take effect in 2023, is a significant legal framework governing adoption. It replaces the previous Adoption of Children Act 1939, with the aim of prioritizing the best interests and welfare of children, ensuring a fair and balanced approach to adoption, and establishing a robust regulatory system for the adoption process.
Under the ACA 2022, several key changes have been introduced to enhance the adoption process and ensure the suitability of adoptive parents. Let’s delve deeper into these changes:
Eligibility to Make an Adoption Application: To make an adoption application, the applicant(s) must be habitually resident in Singapore. For joint applicants, at least one of the applicants must be a Singapore Citizen, or both applicants must be Permanent Residents. However, sole applicants must be either Singapore Citizens or Permanent Residents. Persons convicted of serious crimes are prohibited from adopting to prioritize the safety and well-being of the child.
Guardian-in-Adoption (GIA): Previously, applicants needed to make a separate application for the consent of the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) to act as the Guardian-In-Adoption (GIA). However, under the ACA 2022, a public officer appointed by the Minister will automatically assume the role of the GIA. This change streamlines the process and ensures consistency in safeguarding the child’s interests.
Pre-adoption Requirements: The ACA 2022 introduces specific requirements that applicants must fulfil before filing an adoption application, which includes attending a compulsory Pre-Adoption Briefing (PAB). PABs provide essential information about the adoption process and the responsibilities of adoptive parents. Additionally, applicants must attend a briefing on the disclosure of adoptive status conducted by Authorized Adoption Agencies (AAA). It is also critical that applicants obtain a valid and favourable Adoption Suitability Assessment (ASA) from an AAA. The ASA assesses the applicants’ suitability to adopt a child and ensures they are prepared for the responsibilities of parenthood. It is necessary to have attended the PAB and resided in Singapore for one continuous year before applying for an ASA.
Consent of Relevant Persons: The ACA 2022 emphasizes the importance of obtaining valid consent from relevant persons involved in the adoption process. Relevant persons include parents, guardians, custodians, and those responsible for the child’s financial support. Consent must be obtained in the prescribed form and witnessed by two individuals who are at least 21 years old. This requirement ensures the transparency and legality of the adoption process, maintaining the best interests of the child.
Additionally, the ACA 2022 addresses various offenses related to adoption. For example, it strictly regulates the publication or broadcast of information/pictures that may identify a child undergoing adoption. Exceptions to this rule are allowed only with the child’s consent, when the adoption is successful, or with the relevant person’s approval. Prohibitions against improper payments, rewards, or inducements for adoption purposes are also established to maintain the integrity and fairness of the adoption process.
Furthermore, the ACA 2022 empowers Authorized Adoption Agencies (AAAs) and the GIA to direct assessments, request further information, and order mediation or counselling if necessary. This enables a comprehensive evaluation of the adoptive applicants, ensuring their suitability to provide a safe and nurturing environment for the child.
It is important to note that the ACA 2022 introduces stringent measures to prevent non-compliance. Failure to fulfil obligations, such as reporting offenses, complying with court orders, or providing false information, may result in penalties or legal consequences.
The ACA 2022 represents a significant step towards enhancing the adoption process in Singapore. By prioritizing the child’s welfare, establishing clear eligibility criteria, and enforcing strict guidelines, the legislation aims to facilitate the placement of children in loving and supportive homes while safeguarding their rights and interests.
Please note that this summary is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For detailed guidance and specific adoption-related matters, it is recommended to consult IRB Law Adoption Lawyers or seek other professional legal assistance.
Case Examples: Adoption Success Stories
Please note that these are real cases handled by IRB adoption lawyers. However, the names and identification details of clients have been altered to protect confidentiality.
Case 1: Smith Family Adoption
In the case of the Smith family, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, both Singapore citizens, desired to adopt a child below the age of 5. They met the eligibility requirements and obtained consent from the child’s biological parents. With the assistance of IRB Law Adoption Lawyers, they successfully submitted their adoption application and attended the Pre-Adoption Briefing. The Guardian-In-Adoption was appointed, and the MSF conducted an investigation. Eventually, the Family Court granted an adoption order, and the Smiths became the proud parents of their adopted child.
Case 2: Lim Family Adoption
The Lim family consisted of Mr. Lim, a Singapore citizen, and his wife, Mrs. Lim, a Singapore permanent resident. They sought to adopt their stepchild, who was a Singapore citizen. IRB Law adoption lawyers assisted them in navigating the adoption process and obtaining the necessary waivers for the Home Study Report. The family complied with all requirements, including obtaining consent from relevant parties. Following a successful hearing at the Family Court, the adoption order was granted, and the Lims embraced their new family dynamic.
Conclusion:
Adopting a child is a life-changing process, and understanding the legal requirements and procedures is essential. IRB Law adoption lawyers are dedicated to guiding you through the adoption process with expertise and transparency. Our legal counsel will provide the constructive support and advice necessary for success at each stage of the adoption process. For further assistance, please reach out to us for a consultation.
Author: Mohamed Baiross/IRB LAW LLP
Rating
Mr Baiross and his team helped me with my litigation case and offered really good advice. I am very appreciative of his work and expertise as it helped me close my case. Thank you🙏🏼🥹
Excellent service from Mr. Baiross and the team at IRB Law LLP. The consultation was clear, professional, and provided very practical solutions. Thanks!
Cannot praise the team at IRB Law enough... from Mohamed Baiross's prompt reply to my whatsapp message late in the night, to Hadhri's prompt follow-up and assistance, they made the process of getting of a POA a really smooth one. Given our tight deadline, the team was very patient and super duper helpful in answering our queries and lending the helping hand. Thank you so much again for everything, we really appreciate it. Kudos to the wonderful team! Cheers! 😀
Highly recommended! With their welcoming office, I had a great experience with IRB Law. Kudos to Mr. Ahmad Ghazi, Mr. Baiross, and the rest of the IRB Law team for their efficiency and excellent coordination. Special thanks to Mr. Ahmad Ghazi, who handled my queries with exceptional professionalism, patience, and dedication from the very beginning. He took the time to explain the process clearly, answered all my questions promptly, and provided clear legal advice on possible future scenarios as well. It was all smooth process within 2 weeks!
We engaged IRB for a recent case and had an absolutely wonderful experience with Mr Baiross and Mr Joel. From our very first consultation, we knew we were in good hands. Mr Baiross took the time to understand our situation and walked us through the potential consequences with so much empathy, patience and genuine concern. He never made us feel rushed, and his ability to explain everything clearly gave us a lot of reassurance during what was a very stressful period for us. It was clear from the very first conversation that he genuinely cared about helping us, and we knew we wanted to engage him and his team. We were also incredibly fortunate to work with Joel throughout the process. His friendly and approachable demeanour made it so easy to communicate with him. He always kept us focused on the end goal, while making the entire process feel much less daunting. At times, it genuinely felt like we were discussing things with a friend rather than a lawyer. What we appreciated most about Joel was his ability to empathise with our situation and understand how we were feeling before offering his thoughts and advice. He never made us feel like our concerns were insignificant, and we always felt heard, respected and supported. His professionalism, patience and personal touch really stood out to us. Highly recommended to anyone looking for a team that is not only professional and knowledgeable, but also genuinely empathetic and invested in their clients.
Areas of focus
- General adoption guidance
- Procedural aspects of adoption
- Legal implications in adoption
- Unmarried expectant couples
- Expectant single mothers
- Adopting partners child
Why Us
Why Choose IRB Law
Experienced in Singapore Adoption Matters
We guide clients through the adoption process with clarity and care, ensuring all legal requirements are properly met.
Supportive, Solutions-Focused Approach
We provide calm, practical guidance that reduces stress and helps create a smooth, positive adoption journey.
Transparent Fees
We offer clear, competitive pricing with no hidden costs, giving you confidence and peace of mind throughout the process.
Our Lawyers
Meet Some of the Adoption Lawyers at IRB
Mohamed Baiross
Mohamed Baiross is the managing partner of IRB Law and one of the nation's leading lawyers in multiple practice areas, including civil, corporate, and commercial law. With over three decades of experience as a business lawyer, Mohamed Baiross has built a renowned corporate law firm in Singapore, providing expert legal services to global corporations and local businesses.
Kulvinder Kaur
Kulvinder Kaur is a prominent commercial and corporate lawyer and an expert in litigation matters. Kaur is well-known in all courts of Singapore for strong legal representation in the most complex cases across multiple practice areas.
Google Reviews
Testimonials
Mr Baiross and his team helped me with my litigation case and offered really good advice. I am very appreciative of his work and expertise as it helped me close my case. Thank you🙏🏼🥹
We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to the team at I.R.B Law LLP, especially Rano, who attended the court hearing with us, as well as everyone who assisted us throughout the entire divorce proceedings. This journey was definitely not an easy one, and there were many uncertainties along the way. We are thankful that throughout the entire process, the team was always patient in listening to our concerns and guiding us whenever we were unsure of the next step. They made the legal process easier for us to understand and gave us the reassurance we needed to get through each stage. One thing we especially appreciated was how realistic and transparent the team was with us. They would always prepare us for what to expect, including the possible worst-case scenarios. Rather than giving us false expectations, they helped us understand the different possibilities and manage our expectations accordingly. This allowed us to mentally prepare ourselves for whatever the outcome might be, even if it was not necessarily the outcome we hoped for. That honesty and guidance meant a lot to us throughout the process. Whenever we had questions or were unsure about something, the team was always there to guide us through it. Our enquiries were attended to promptly and professionally, and we truly appreciated how responsive and patient they were, especially during moments when we needed further clarification or reassurance. What meant the most was knowing that we did not have to navigate such a difficult process alone. Having a team that was professional yet understanding made an already stressful and emotionally exhausting journey much more manageable. Now that this chapter has finally come to an end, one thought feels especially fitting: “Today is not about who won or who lost. It is about finally closing a chapter that took more from everyone than it should have. Some endings don’t need celebration or resentment — just acceptance, peace, and the grace to move forward.” And that is exactly how we choose to look at the end of this journey. To Rano and the entire I.R.B team who played a part in getting us through this process, thank you for your professionalism, honesty, patience, guidance and support. We are sincerely grateful for everything you have done for us, and it will not be forgotten. 🤍
This company my friend recommend for divorcee case. Fast working reliable company, ready take case and actions immediately. Transparent calculations fees, high respect especially to Leong Zhen Yang and Faiza: fast, precise, punctual work does not neglect any detail, my case was complicated and risky. Thanks a lot!!!😍🙏❤️
Truly grateful to the team for assisting me throughout my divorce case at the Syariah Court, as well as my maintenance matter at the Family Justice Courts. From the very beginning, the lawyers were professional, knowledgeable and responsive. What stood out to me most was how committed they were to my case. They were willing to go the extra mile and fight for their client’s best interests, while ensuring that I understood the legal process and my options along the way. Going through a divorce and maintenance matter is never easy, but having lawyers who genuinely listen, guide and stand by you makes a huge difference. I always felt that my case was taken seriously and that they were willing to go all out to achieve the best possible outcome for me. I highly appreciate their dedication, professionalism and support throughout the entire journey. I would definitely recommend this law firm to anyone looking for a reliable, professional and committed legal team.
We engaged IRB for a recent case and had an absolutely wonderful experience with Mr Baiross and Mr Joel. From our very first consultation, we knew we were in good hands. Mr Baiross took the time to understand our situation and walked us through the potential consequences with so much empathy, patience and genuine concern. He never made us feel rushed, and his ability to explain everything clearly gave us a lot of reassurance during what was a very stressful period for us. It was clear from the very first conversation that he genuinely cared about helping us, and we knew we wanted to engage him and his team. We were also incredibly fortunate to work with Joel throughout the process. His friendly and approachable demeanour made it so easy to communicate with him. He always kept us focused on the end goal, while making the entire process feel much less daunting. At times, it genuinely felt like we were discussing things with a friend rather than a lawyer. What we appreciated most about Joel was his ability to empathise with our situation and understand how we were feeling before offering his thoughts and advice. He never made us feel like our concerns were insignificant, and we always felt heard, respected and supported. His professionalism, patience and personal touch really stood out to us. Highly recommended to anyone looking for a team that is not only professional and knowledgeable, but also genuinely empathetic and invested in their clients.
I had a wonderful experience working with Faustina Joyce Fernando at IRB Law LLP. After struggling for a long time to navigate complex, stalled court document extractions on my own, Faustina stepped in with immense empathy, efficiency, and professionalism. She made strategic decisions that brought a swift, complete resolution to my case in record time. I am incredibly grateful for her clear guidance, kindness, and dedication. Highly recommend Faustina and the family legal team at IRB Law to anyone seeking reliable and compassionate legal support!
Thumbs up to Norlina and her team. They are a nice team to work with as they handled our case with utmost professionalism. Highly recommended.
Highly recommended for anyone seeking legal action. Case was handled professionally and I got the result that I was hoping to get. Consider the result as a win. Case handled by Mr Koh Boon Yang and Mr Zachary Lim was done with exceptional skill.
Andrew Wong and the IRB team were great in supporting my case, answering my questions and advocating for the best options for me. Quick responses with initiative, and helpful! Led to a win for me and would consult them again.